Session: Session 4 / Regency Room
Date/Time: May 1, 2013 / 09:00-10:15

Panel Description

East Asia’s long history of conquest, occupation, and shifting spheres of influence has left bitter memories that continue to hinder rapprochement and prospects for cooperations. Territorial disputes over Dokdo, the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands, the Nansha/Spratleys, and the South China Sea—all of which are based on historical claims of ownership—have the potential to ignite military hostilities. Intensifying nationalist sentiments are apparent across the region, from the vitriolic hatred displayed in recent demonstrations in China to the resurgent ultranationalist leanings in Japan. Indeed, it appears that a more prosperous Asia may not necessarily be a more peaceful Asia. All of this begs the question: Without resolving this historical baggage, can East Asia ever hope to truly enjoy lasting peace in what is often called the “Asian Century”?

Guiding Questions

1. 1. Do any of the region’s historical disputes, either individually or collectively, have the potential to escalate to a military conflict?
2. 2. Can these recent flare-ups be put aside by countries in an effort to deal with more pressing issues such as security concerns (e.g. North Korea) and economic interests (e.g. trade negotiation)?
3. 3. What are the key differences between Europe and Asia’s historical disputes? What are the lessons, if any, that Asian countries can take from European examples?